+1 817-968-5551
+61-488-839-671
+44-7480-542904
4.6
4.72
4.92
Impact of Positive Psychology
Coaching on Teachers’ “career confidence”
Abstract
This article represents a “strength-based approach” to teacher “professional development” drawing on positive psychology, “career confidence”, and perceptions of teacher quality. To explore the program's impact in private school contexts in the UAE, self-efficacy, autonomy, competence, and understanding were examined through the use of a primary method design. Results demonstrated that there was a statistically significant increase in both autonomy and self-efficacy when coaching others. Building on the potentials currently existing among active teachers and schools might provide the best opportunities to ensure engagement and development. When teachers develop more confidence, they may make more active choices in career matters. Measurement consisted of survey questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and written reflections. Interpretive analyses of these data disclosed that teachers started the program with low “career confidence” characterised by negative emotions and a lack of self-awareness. Results of post-program surveys showed career commitment to be on the rise with teachers taking on a more positive, self-aware, and optimistic outlook. From the thematic analysis, changes have taken place in the building up of hope, thinking processes shifting, and employing “positive psychology coaching” interventions.
Keywords: “Positive psychology coaching”, “Career confidence”, “Teacher Self-Efficacy”, “teacher well-being”, “Teacher Autonomy”, “UAE Private Schools”, “Teacher Retention”, “professional development”, “Strengths-Based Approach”
Table of Contents
3.2 Participants and Design of the Study
Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Result
4.2. Data Preparation and Descriptive Statistics.
4.2.2. Descriptive Statistics:
Chapter 6: Conclusion & Recommendations
Appendix 1: Frequency Analysis
Appendix 2: Descriptive Statistics
Appendix 5: Correlation Analysis
Appendix 6: Regression Analysis
Table of Figures
Figure 2.1: Theoretical Framework
Figure 4.1: Frequency Analysis of the Variables
Figure 4.2: Descriptive Statistics
Figure 4.3: Frequency Distribution of pre-intervention scores of Classroom Challenge
Figure 4.4: Frequency Distribution of pre-intervention scores of Teaching Autonomy
Figure 4.6: Correlation Analysis
Figure 4.7: Regression Analysis
Positive psychology coaching holds significant potential for enhancing teacher well-being and career confidence within the demanding context of UAE private schools.
Coaching psychology is defined as the systematic application of behavioural sciences to improve the lives, job performances, and well-being of individuals and organizations, in the absence of any severe mental health issues or extreme distress (Passmore and Lai, 2020). This link identifies that coaching psychology is strongly associated with positive psychology since both have a central interest in the knowledge of optimal functioning and well-being. Research has established that positive psychology coaching works well for adults, teachers, and managers in both the formal setting-appropriately with a professional coach and less formal or peer coaching basis (Burke et al., 2022). While scholarship into coaching as a form of psychology is rather recent, empirical evidence thus far suggests it offers a helpful intervention in various populations and contexts.
“Career confidence” plays a significant role in career choices and changes. Research indicates that higher confidence levels can facilitate positive career transitions (Hamzah et al., 2021). Confidence levels vary across fields of study, with business-related disciplines exhibiting the highest confidence, while humanities students show lower levels. The developing field of positive psychology may provide us with a productive approach to career change support because it collaborates with coaching. There is an obvious overlap between positive psychology and coaching which make up “career confidence”. Through this definition of “career confidence”, the literature review will discuss a deeper examination of the concept of career change and the means by which positive psychological interventions might support the development of “career confidence” through a coaching program.
Recent research has highlighted the importance of well-being in career development and success. Positive psychology approaches to career coaching can enhance both the process and content of interventions. A social cognitive model has been developed to capture the interplay of multiple factors contributing to job satisfaction, which is a domain-specific aspect of subjective well-being (Grass, 2024). Some of the most important concepts within positive psychology include strengths, resiliencies, and optimism-which have emerged on top while examining job satisfaction in a different survey undertaken. Through the analysis of positive emotions, signature strengths, and traits, positive psychologists seek to find circumstances under which humans thrive, flourish, and prosper. The creation of such an ideal environment is the challenge every educator wishes for his or her classroom. The challenge is to design work environments that will be beneficial to both teachers and students, creating skills in teachers who are genuinely committed to self-development. These are also proactive and optimistic teachers who never give up in adversities, but rather propose solutions and face the problem.
The high turnover rate of teachers in private schools in the UAE is a major problem because it affects the quality of education as well as the school's stability. This is caused by the following stressors; excessive stress, poor support systems and little to no chances of professional development. Solutions might include focusing on teacher well-being and creating an engaged and resilient workforce that is helped through positive psychology coaching.
The aim of this study is to explore and understand the impact of Positive Psychology Coaching on teachers' “career confidence” within the unique context of private schools in the UAE.
● To assess the impact of positive psychology coaching on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction in UAE private schools using pre- and post-intervention surveys.
● To investigate the influence of positive psychology coaching on teacher self-awareness and its relationship to career decision-making in UAE private schools.
● To explore the qualitative experiences of teachers regarding the positive psychology coaching intervention and its impact on their perception of the work environment.
● How does positive psychology coaching influence teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction in UAE private schools?
● What is the relationship between positive psychology coaching, teacher self-awareness, and career decision-making in UAE private schools?
● How do teachers perceive the impact of the positive psychology coaching intervention on their work environment and overall well-being?
This study employs a pre- and post-intervention survey design with 51 participants from a private school in Dubai. Data will be analysed using paired t-tests to determine statistically significant changes in self-efficacy and autonomy. Qualitative data from session notes will further inform the interpretation of the quantitative findings.
The last couple of years have seen the proliferation of coaching psychology as an important area of study in the context of schooling, especially within private schools. In particular, coaching psychology has surfaced as a significant area of concern in educational context with respect to improving the professionalism and wellbeing of teachers (Adams and Lee, 2021). In this part, the use of coaching psychology to improve the professionalism and psychological well-being of teachers is examined. The issue has been set in the context of how teachers can be coached to handle their professional growth and psychological self-care in the workplace more efficiently.
It is widely acknowledged that conventional “professional development” programs do not provide teachers with lasting growth. Problems relating to poor systems or structures, lack of resources, insufficient leadership, and unreasonable short-term target pressures have been cited as reasons for this ineffectiveness. Moreover, the overemphasis on problems instead of being solution-oriented, coupled with the absence of teachers’ participation in designing professional learning programs, further restricts the effectiveness of such programs. Such environments do not stimulate creativity and innovation. On the contrary, they foster mediocrity, minimal effort, and fixed mindsets, causing teachers to shirk responsibility and transform their classrooms into uninspiring learning environments. This lack of motivation towards “professional development” can foster emotional deterioration, burnout, or promote negative views directed to any form of work or innovation (Farahmand, 2022). These issues can be addressed by incorporating teacher support programs that aim at managing stress while also providing incentive to keep the teacher motivated so that she or he continues to grow professionally and personally.
The purpose of this study is to understand the impact of Positive Psychology Coaching on the “career confidence” of teachers working in private schools in the UAE. The 2023 changes in the policies about hiring teachers, licensing them, and cutting back on staff has resulted in a greater number of people transitioning into the teaching profession. It has been shown that high levels of confidence help an individual perform positively in decision making, but having a notion of confidence is definitely subjective to people. This study is being done in a private K-12 American Curriculum School in Dubai and participants include 5 females and one male in the elementary school who are prospective career changers. The goal of this coaching program is to activate motivation, belief in sheer abilities, and use signature strengths for professional growth and mental wellness among the participants. This study will evaluate the outcome of the coaching, which is blended with positive psychology interventions, on “career confidence” of the participants.
The motivation behind this study centres on probing the effects of Positive Psychology Coaching on the perceived level of “career confidence” of educators teaching in private schools in the UAE. There has been an increase in people transitioning into the teaching profession due to the 2023 changes in the policy regarding the hiring of teachers, their licensing and even down staffing. It has been proven that there are lots of other factors that persistently affect one’s decision-making other than confidence, so certainly a notion of confidence is subjective. This study is carried out in a private K-12 American Curriculum School in Dubai and participants include five females and one male in elementary school who wish to change their career. This coaching program is designed to help participants integrate strong intrinsic motivation, confidence and their unique abilities to achieve professional success and psychological well-being. This study will evaluate the outcome of coaching blended with positive psychology interventions on the learners' “career confidence”.
Currently, private schools in the United Arab Emirates face challenging rates of teacher attrition. Some of the contributing factors as revealed in the exit interviews are excessive workload and deadlines, lack of support from management and older superiors, low level of pay, and unsatisfactory attitude from parents, students, and the school’s administrators. Moreover, a distinct absence of compassion within the school setting has been described as one of the central issues of that problem (Mohammad and Borkoski, 2024). Addressing these challenges is crucial for improving job satisfaction, teacher self-efficacy, and overall engagement among educators.
Positive psychology coaching offers a promising solution for teachers who are contemplating a career change due to diminished “career confidence”. A tailored coaching program has been developed to tackle the specific obstacles these teachers face. The program includes 51 participants from various backgrounds, each with approximately a year and a half of tenure at the school. A common hurdle for these teachers is maintaining a healthy work-life balance, which significantly impedes their professional growth. The researcher expects that positive psychology coaching will not only provide effective solutions to these issues but also create a safe and confidential space for teachers to address their concerns. The primary goal of the coaching is to help teachers recognize their strengths and learn how to utilize these strengths to excel in their roles.
The integration of positive psychology coaching in educational settings has emerged as a pivotal strategy for enhancing teachers' “career confidence”, particularly within the dynamic environment of private schools in the UAE (Al-Waqfi, 2023). In this case, such coaching not only supports teachers’ “professional development”, but also their psychological wellbeing and has the power to improve their educational practices and results. This discussion analyses the impact of positive psychology coaching on teachers’ “professional development” and health and its implications for education.

(Source: Self-Developed)
The above framework includes Positive Psychology Coaching (PPC) in order to improve Teacher Resilience; Teacher Well Being; Teacher Self Efficacy. PPC also works on encouraging optimism and building confidence on teachers to help the teacher burn out well and manage stress, hence ensuring Teacher Job Satisfaction. This is based on Seligman’s PERMA model and Bandura’s self-efficacy theory, which is in line with the growth of professionals and psychological well-being, which contributes to the teaching practices and the achievement of students.
The features of positive psychology, like focusing on strengths, resilience, and optimal functioning, provide sustenance to the coaching strategies geared towards improving self-efficacy among teachers (Lambert et al. 2021). In the case of private schools in the UAE, with its cut-throat competitions and unrealistic expectations, positive psychology coaching helps to thrive (Lambert et al., 2021). This type of coaching adopts a strengths-based approach and helps teachers boost their self-efficacy and job satisfaction by identifying and harnessing their skills.
The term coaching has a different meaning now than it did some years ago. What began as a novelty workplace coaching is now a standard approach in any organizational improvement process. The term "coach" is broadly applied, encompassing anyone who guides, mentors, or supports others in their professional journey. Organizations often turn to coaching to address a range of issues, from unclear expectations and inadequate feedback to lack of career development opportunities. The effectiveness of coaching, however, is contingent upon a well-structured and supportive environment.
The UAE's educational landscape is characterized by its diversity and rapid development, presenting both opportunities and challenges for educators (Abdallah, 2022). Private schools, in particular, often demand a high level of performance and adaptability from teachers. In this environment, “career confidence” defined as a teacher's belief in their ability to succeed in their professional roles becomes crucial. Positive psychology coaching addresses this need by focusing on the development of core psychological capacities such as optimism, hope, and resilience. Similarly, a coach facilitates self-discovery and skill-building rather than dictating solutions. Balanced coaching practice involves guiding to generate possible solutions, empowering the individual to explore possible options available to them.
This literature review seeks to explore the aspects of positive psychology coaching and their impact on teachers' career self-efficacy. It will analyze the theoretical context of positive psychology and its practice in coaching along with the available evidence to prove its use in the educational context. This review aims to provide insight into the role of positive psychology coaching in improving teachers' self-efficacy and, thus, positively impacting the educational process and quality of life among teachers and their satisfaction from teaching.
Evaluating the effect of coaching is always problematic. The feel-good factor is often thought of as not worth considering, and whether coaching has the capacity to make an organization an ideal place to work is debatable. There are four stages of measuring and sustaining a coaching culture within an organization such as nascent, tactical, strategic, and embedded. Each stage denotes a certain measure of dependence and integration of coaching activities, which emphasizes the need for a specific approach to achieve targeted objectives. Coming up in the next sections, we will discuss the primary principles and theories of positive psychology and their specific coaching techniques, as well as the quantitative data showing the results of positive psychology coaching on teachers’ “career confidence” in private schools in the UAE.
Positive Psychology Coaching (PPC) is a special form of coaching for professional growth and development focusing on educational settings (Richter et al., 2021). PPC stems from the teachings of psychology, and its areas of focus are developing, building, and improving strength, resilience, and overall wellness (Stevenson, 2024). Contrary to other coaching styles that prefer focusing on a person’s problem areas, PPC uses an individual’s existing positive characteristics to help them learn and grow. Such an approach is useful when dealing with the unique circumstances surrounding the private school sector in the UAE, where teachers have to deal with numerous challenges that can lower their self-esteem and make them dissatisfied with their careers.
The basis of PPC is the work of Martin Seligman who is well known for his work in positive psychology. With the PERMA model distinguishing between Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Achievement, Seligman gives a full description of how to understand and promote one's well-being (Kovich et al., 2023). Focusing on all five components, PPC seeks to assist teachers in managing stress and succeeding in their professional functions. The goal of the model is to assist people to experience positive feelings, fully immerse themselves in work, foster relationships, and derive meaning and achievement from their undertakings. Such an approach is effective in education, where emotional and social dynamics of teaching are as important as pedagogical ones for the effectiveness of both the teacher and the learner.
One of the core advantages of PPC is improving self-efficacy of teachers, which is defined as the person’s conviction that he or she can carry out the actions needed to achieve particular outcomes. A positive effect of a positive psychology intervention on teachers’ efficacy beliefs compared to a control group. PPC assists teachers in acquiring this self-efficacy by concentrating on their strengths and past achievements, which increases their confidence to face challenges in the future (Mok et al. 2023). In addition, PPC is effective in enhancing resilience, which is important to have in today’s ever-changing education milieu. Resilience is defined as the capacity to recover quickly from difficulties and to remain positive even when faced with unfavourable circumstances. PPC allows teachers to cultivate resilience by fostering a growth mindset that allows them to see challenges as constructive learning and developmental opportunities (Wuest and Subramaniam, 2021). This is particularly necessary for the fast-paced and oftentimes volatile climate of private education. Teachers are required to cope with constant alterations in curricula, disparate needs from students, and elevated parental expectations.
In the application of PPC, measures such as wellbeing and career coaching related confidence enhancement are attended to (Smith et al. 2021). These include the use of strengths-based assessments, goal setting, and reflective practices. During strengths-based assessments, teachers are helped to pinpoint their strengths, which serves as a basis for growth and development. As a comma is important in controlling the flow of a sentence, goal setting which is one of the key features of PPC is done alongside the value clarification exercise with the teachers in order to agree upon and work towards clearly defined goals. Reflective practices, including journaling and mindfulness, encourage teachers to think deeply about their feelings, thoughts, and actions.
There is an increasing body of literature that offers a measure of proof of the effectiveness of PPC in increasing the career PPC of teachers. Reported evidence indicates that teachers who undergo PPC are more satisfied with their teaching work, experience less stress, and feel much better than those who do not participate in such programs (Joho et al., 2024). Additionally, PPC has been reported to improve teachers’ skills in managing classroom interactions, establishing good working relations with students, and fostering positive attitudes towards learning among the students. All these results illustrate the possible use of PPC for improving educational quality by concentrating on the health and professional growth of teachers.
Self-efficacy is a concept that is at the centre of social cognitive theory. It describes self-belief regarding one’s ability to complete actions that lead to desired outcomes (Budden et al., 2020). Self-efficacy is important for the understanding of motivation, services and their performance, or well-being in general, especially in an educational context. In teaching, self-efficacy is important with regard to the teachers’ professional behaviours and their relatedness to challenges and job satisfaction.
Self-efficacy as part of social cognitive theory in which it has been suggested that self- and environmental forces act in reciprocal causation instead of one being the cause and the other being the effect (Fryer and Leenknecht, 2023). The factors which lead to self-efficacy development are mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion, and accounts of physiological and emotional states. The most powerful source of self-efficacy is mastery experiences because these accomplishments serve as proof of one’s competence. Self-efficacy can also be enhanced through watching someone else, referred to as, vicarious experiences especially when you relate to the person being observed. Proactive verbal engagement such as giving compliments and positive feedback can enhance self-efficacy, whereas anxiety and stress can be self-defeating.
In the educational sphere, self-efficacy refers to the belief a teacher has regarding their capability to impact student learning and control classroom activities effectively. Teacher self-efficacy of desirable levels is linked to many benefits such as better teaching methods, active participation from students, and overall improvement in academic performance (Woodcock et al. 2022). Teachers who possess positive self-efficacy beliefs are more likely to persevere through difficult situations, pursue further training, and introduce new teaching methods to the classroom. Teacher self-efficacy is found to be one of the most important predictors regarding satisfaction with one's job and the likelihood of staying in the teaching profession. Teachers who consider themselves able to impact their student’s lives report higher levels of job satisfaction and lower incidences of burnout. Self-efficacy, on the other hand, is related to higher levels of stress, emotional exhaustion, and commitment to leave the teaching profession.
Teacher self-efficacy development and sustenance is influenced by various factors. One of the most important factors is mastery experiences, which come from the effective execution of novel teaching methods or effective classroom control (Menno et al., 2024). Self-efficacy can also be strengthened through vicarious experiences, which involve watching skilled coworkers or engaging in professional learning community activities. Self-efficacy can also be strengthened by verbal reinforcement provided by administrators, peers, or even students. Another factor is self-efficacy, emotional and physical states, where self-efficacy is affected by a person’s feelings of anxiety, stress, or other strong emotions. As an example, emotional exhaustion or intense stress can cause strong doubts surrounding self-efficacy beliefs, since they lack confidence in their skills to deal with such situations.
There are a variety of methods that educational institutions can utilize to improve teacher self-efficacy. Investing in “professional development” through providing seminars, coaching and mentoring programs gives teachers the ability, and therefore self-efficacy, to learn new concepts. Encouragement of risk taking and feelings of value within collaborative school culture also promotes and supports self-efficacy. Building self-efficacy through suggestions and constructive appreciation of effort while facilitating a good atmosphere within the institution is also very important for administrators’ self-efficacy (Liu et al., 2021). By adding self-reflection, for example, journaling or self-assessment, teachers have the potential to become more aware of their capabilities and how they can improve, thus enhancing their self-efficacy. Motivating them to set reasonable goals and take pride in achieving them motivates them to believe in themselves even more.
Coaching cultures are vital for effective community-wide coaching integration. Nevertheless, the term ‘coaching culture’ is often popularly and inaccurately simplified to the act of providing coaching to teachers and learners only. A more comprehensive definition of a coaching culture in schools involves embedding reflective and proactive questions throughout the school community to benefit learning, “career confidence”, and the sense of responsibility among staff, parents, students, governors, and stakeholders (Munro et al., 2020).
A common misconception is that hiring external coaches for the leadership team will automatically create a coaching culture. While this can be beneficial to some extent, it does not lead to significant changes in the organizational culture. For a coaching culture to truly take root, it must extend beyond the leadership team and permeate the core of the organization. This requires careful planning and a strategic approach to ensure that coaching is not just an add-on but a fundamental part of the school's ethos.
One critical element in establishing a coaching culture is the execution of the organization's growth plans. Hiring external coaches for every staff member can be cost-prohibitive for most schools. Therefore, schools ought to concentrate on creating an internal supply of coaches by recruiting and developing personnel at every level of the organization. This not only facilitates coaching, but also guarantees that every facet of the school life is blended into the coaching. Coaching need not be limited to the classroom; rather, it should encompass everything, including informal interaction with the personnel who can be taught. These interactions can assist teachers to express their concerns and appreciate enabling them to obtain a degree of self-confidence and personal accountability.
Another important part of a coaching culture is encouraging people through self-directed work, personal development, and role performance outcomes (Viterouli et al. 2022). Stresses the need to grant control to teachers as learners. This can be done by allowing them the freedom to engage in self-reflection, peer coaching, and offering them constructive feedback. In addition, the values and mission of the school should already have a matching coaching culture. This match makes it possible that coaching activities are not considered to be stand-alone activities, but instead, are part of the broader strategy for the improvement of the school. The coaching culture within the school also needs to be mindful of the particular circumstances and characteristics of the community it serves. What is applicable and useful in one institution may not work in another, therefore, it is important that coaching practices are customized to the identified needs and set objectives of the institution.
The issue of educator stress is a global challenge that concerns not only individual countries but an entire system. Understanding the international scope of educator stress is important for developing measures to help teachers and improve their educational outcomes. Besides educator’s personal problems, there are a number of national and international stressors that reduce the quality of the work and life of educators. Those are excessive workload, high enrolment ratios, inadequate facilities and resources, and outcome-based pressure. Furthermore, all the emotional work expected of teachers, such as orchestrating the activities of many pupils and attending to many pupils’ needs, adds considerably to educator stress. The global COVID-19 pandemic has worsened these problems by adding uncertainty and health risk factors to an already complicated profession.
Research indicates that educator stress is not confined to a particular area but rather a global problem (Santiago et al., 2023). Changes imposed by standardized testing and accountability systems have been recognized as problematic for teachers in the USA, just as administrative overhead and lack of self-governance is in many European countries. In Asia, the stringency of the education system together with high parental expectation leads to teacher stress (Ji-hoon, 2024). Mitigating educator stress calls upon a multifactorial response that considers the varying socio-cultural, regional, and educational diversities. Supplying sufficient tools, encouraging professionally refreshing activities, and developing positive organizational surroundings are a few strategies likely to relieve stress and enhance educator’s health. Furthermore, policies that support work-life balance and appreciate the emotive aspects of teaching are necessary for the development of viable and wholesome educational environments.
Stressed teachers in the UAE pose a challenge that requires urgent attention. It has become increasingly clear that teaching professionals within the UAE are significantly overworked and overburdened due to rapid modernisation and over expectations. As part of its mission to enhance wellbeing within private schools in Dubai, the KHDA has made attempts to deal with these issues adequately (KHDA, 2022). In 2018, KHDA partnered with The Wellbeing Lab to conduct the Wellbeing Survey, which brought together over 13000 teachers from 120 private schools in Dubai. The survey is based on the PERMA Workplace Survey and is inspired by Professor Martin Seligman’s theory of well-being. It measures many facets of teachers' wellbeing which encompass positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and achievement.
The results of the aforementioned survey helped school leaders have a deeper understanding of the wellbeing of their staff. These insights become part of the school improvement plans and also contribute to the broader wellbeing agenda of the Dubai Government. Based on this new information, the KHDA has transformed the PERMA model further by incorporating Health as a core fundamental and officially calling it the PERMAH model in the private schools of Dubai. This aims at supporting teachers to not only comprehend the importance of taking charge of their wellbeing but also help in creating a healthier and more robust educational environment.
The case for educator stress in the UAE is best approached with a multi-faceted and data-informed technique. The KHDA and the PERMAH model initiatives seem to offer a clear solution to achieve better teacher health and an improved educational environment. The quality and effectiveness of teaching is a complex challenge that affects the worldwide educational outcomes. The quality and efficiency of teaching are crucial constituents in the accomplishment of educational objectives. Meanwhile, many factors impede the establishment and sustenance of an efficient and effective quality teaching staff. This segment examines the primary issues concerning the quality and effectiveness of teachers using academic literature and empirical data cumulatively.
One of the primary challenges in maintaining teacher quality is the recruitment and retention of highly qualified educators. Attracting talented individuals to the teaching profession and keeping them engaged and motivated is a persistent issue. Factors such as competitive salaries, “professional development” opportunities, and supportive work environments play a crucial role in attracting and retaining high-quality teachers. According to the Economic Policy Institute, investing in teachers can significantly impact student achievement, but substantial and targeted investments are necessary to staff classrooms with high-quality educators, especially in challenging environments (Epi.org, 2025).
Effective “professional development” is essential for enhancing teacher quality and effectiveness. However, many teachers lack access to high-quality, ongoing “professional development” opportunities. Traditional “professional development” programs often fall short in providing the relevant and practical training that teachers need to improve their instructional practices (Fairman et al. 2022). Research indicates that “professional development” should be job-embedded, collaborative, and focused on specific content areas and teaching strategies to be most effective.
Measuring teacher effectiveness is a complex and contentious issue. While standardized tests and student achievement data are commonly used to evaluate teacher performance, these measures often fail to capture the full range of a teacher's impact on student learning. Moreover, the quality of existing tests varies, limiting their utility for understanding teachers' contributions to student learning. Developing comprehensive and fair evaluation systems that consider multiple dimensions of teacher performance is a significant challenge.
Effective classroom management is a critical aspect of teacher quality and effectiveness. Teachers must be skilled in managing diverse classrooms, addressing the needs of students from various backgrounds, and creating inclusive learning environments (Al‐Rashaida and Massouti, 2024). However, many teachers struggle with classroom management, particularly in dealing with disruptive behavior and meeting the diverse learning needs of their students. “professional development” and support in classroom management strategies are essential for improving teacher effectiveness.
Teachers frequently face challenges related to work-life balance and well-being. The demanding nature of the teaching profession, including long working hours, high workloads, and emotional stress, can lead to burnout and reduced effectiveness. Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is crucial for teachers' well-being and their ability to perform effectively in the classroom. Schools and educational systems must prioritize “teacher well-being” by providing support and resources to help teachers manage stress and maintain a balanced life (Gearhart et al., 2022).
The quality of the curriculum and instructional resources available to teachers significantly impacts their effectiveness. Outdated or inadequate materials can hinder teachers' ability to deliver high-quality instruction. Ensuring that teachers have access to up-to-date, relevant, and high-quality resources is essential for supporting effective teaching practices. Additionally, the curriculum itself plays a vital role in student outcomes, with research suggesting that a well-designed curriculum can lead to better student achievement.
This chapter outlines the procedure followed to investigate the impact of practical positivity on teachers’ “career confidence” in the private educational institutions of the UAE. The study utilized a quantitative method after the intervention, employing a Self-Efficacy and Autonomy pre-and post-intervention survey. Quantitative data will require statistical tests in order to compare the scores before and after treatment or intervention. The survey plan, details of the sampling technique that will be used, and measures adopted to ensure reliability and validity of the data will also be highlighted in the chapter. Issues to do with ethics such as consent and confidentiality of data were critical in undertaking the research.
The second question, “To what extent does Positive Psychology Coaching affect self-awareness and career decision-making among teachers in the UAE?” reduces the scope by analyzing the impact of the coaching on self-awareness and its consequences on profession selection. This question focuses more on the quality of the intervention by addressing and adopting the change of mindset from quantitative measures of self-efficacy to the thought and feeling of teachers (Kramer et al., 2023). It affirms that “career confidence” can impact the decisions insofar as the development of self-awareness is considered as the principal mediator. This question may take further analysis using survey information most significantly, quantitative to evaluate on how teachers appreciate their higher self-awareness and in what ways, if any, it augments their career movement.
The third question, “How effectively can the 'Quality from Within' (QfW) approach create working environments where teachers can thrive and flourish?” is another transposition from the previous question into the organisational perspective. This question aims at evaluating the ability of the coaching approach to enhance a positive and encouraging learning atmosphere that is favourable to all teachers. They explore ownership, transferability, and potential for replicability of the intervention to increase beyond the patients’ level of an organisation. This question may require an evaluation of the basic character of the school and its environment with regard to the QfW approach either through a set of questionnaires or observations made prior to and subsequent to the change. It also implies defining the meaning of ‘thrive and flourish’ especially in the context of the UAE education system.
Thus, the dependent variables raise an intricate approach to measure the effectiveness of positive psychology coaching as it seeks to answer the following research questions. It moves from the analysis of self-efficacy based on numbers to qualitative discussions about self-identity and choice to the final analysis of the manner in which the program is capable of promoting a positively charged organizational culture. The advantage of the proposed research design is that it can accommodate these aspects and capture the main elements of the intervention comprehensively.
In this study, a quantitative research methodology was adopted to determine the effects of positive psychology intervention in teachers’ Self-Efficacy and “career confidence” in a private school in UAE. The participants of this research were 51 participants of an elementary school where five of them were females, and only one was a male teacher practicing at an American curriculum school in Dubai. These teachers were purposely chosen because of their willingness to be involved in a coaching program and after interacting with them in the early part of this study, it was ascertained that they had intentions of career mobility. As with any study, the sample size restricts generalization of the results; however, with specific sampling methods the study focused on the representatives of a specific context, those who demonstrated similar characteristics, in this case, people with moderate tenure of around one and a half years at the school considering a career change.
This increases the internal reliability of the study since the level of variable that confounds the relationship between the dependent variable or the coaching intervention as well as the outcome measures is reduced. This short experience also has the advantage of giving an understanding of the difficulties faced by the teachers at the very beginning of their career in the constantly developing educational system of the UAE. All the participants consented to participate in the study prior to participating in the study hence amicable ethics in research were followed. The study was also planned into pre-test/post-test. Before the participants embarked on the four-session coaching intervention that was grounded on positive psychological theory, a pre- survey was administered with the goal of assessing self-efficiency, autonomy and other related constructs in the “career confidence” domain. First, to conduct the survey, the questionnaire was constructed based on the scales identified in the literature and modified for the purpose of the current study, and thus complied with the principles of inter-observer reliability. Of the four sessions, the sessions by themselves were about increasing becoming more confident, having self-beliefs, hope, optimism, and resilience.
Participants were asked to fill in the same questionnaire and the results were compared to the scores obtained after the mere conclusion of the intervention. The findings collected from this pre-test/post-test design study will be statistically analysed by means of the suitable test, such as paired t-test, to ascertain the level of raised self-efficacy and autonomy. The choice of the specific tests will depend on the distribution of the data and the type of the variables to be used in the study. Thus, despite the fact that one can encounter several limitations when analysing the results, stemming from the small sample size, the focus on a particular subject area in sampling enables a significantly more detailed investigation of the characteristics of an intervention on the specified population group. This weakness might limit the generalisation of the findings of the study and therefore will be acknowledged in the discussion section with a view of suggesting that future studies should use a bigger sample size and participants from diverse groups.
The data collection process for this study was mainly based on a quantitative research design consisting of pre- and post-intervention survey questionnaires conducted on the 51 participants of the selected schools (Salam et al., 2023). Careful attention was paid to the development of this survey instrument in order to obtain assessment of key variables related to the research questions which include self-efficacy and autonomy; or, what is commonly known as “career confidence”. The instrument used scales drawn from existing literature and questionnaires and redeveloped to fit the situation in the UAE and the teachers in elementary schools. The questionnaire was pre-tested to a smaller group of teachers who were not part of the study to detect any ambiguity in wording of the questions, difficulty in understanding the questions or format of the response. The results from the pilot test were incorporated in making adjustments hence strengthening the reliability and validity of the instrument.
The pre-intervention survey was completed by the participants at the beginning of the study and before the commencement of positive psychology coaching intervention (Aboalshamat et al., 2020). This established a baseline measurement of their self-efficacy, autonomy, and related constructs. The same assessment was readministered at the end of the program after the four-session coaching program that was administered to the participants. The same instrument was used in both time points to maintain validity in the data collected and also enabled the accomplishment of a between group pre and post-test. To control the internal source of error, high level of compliance with survey administration procedures was observed to reduce potential bias. The participants received clear instructions and instructions and were allowed to fill the survey in a comfortable and private environment. In order to ensure anonymity and confidentiality, the participants’ responses were coded and kept in secured places. The replies from the questionnaires were entered in a statistical software package to enhance the analysis of the data. This means that the type of software and the statistical test used in analysing the data depended on the type of data collected and the research questions.
Besides the collected statistical data, data about the intervention was also gathered and recorded in the resource (Olayemi et al., 2022). Top of those was the facility documentation of the specific session that was conducted such as, outlines of the session, notes that were taken during the coaching session with the consent of the participants as well as any other materials that were used during the period of the intervention.
The ethical considerations were given due consideration before, during and after the entire conduct of this study. Superior to study enrolment, all the teachers completed consent forms that would show they volunteered to be part of the study and understood the essence of the study, measures to be utilized in the study, possible risks and benefits involved in study participation. The obtaining of consent made sure that the participants understood their rights and they had the free will to participate or not. There was strict observation of privacy and secrecy while conducting the study. Certain measures were also taken to ensure that the participants’ confidentiality was kept so as to ensure that responses given during surveys and interviews could be used as documented evidence.
Data was kept secure as the researchers used password protection data and complied with all the rules of data protection. The data was collected in such a way that the identity of the participants was not revealed during the analysis of the results and when writing the research reports or papers. This study complied strictly with all the set ethical principles as well as rules to ensure that participants’ rights to physical and information security were protected. All the different possibilities of risk to participants were prevented due to careful planning and implementation of the study plan. The intervention itself was meant to be helpful and all the participants were free to leave the study at any time with no consequences or repercussions. Ethical considerations of the study were cleared and recommended by the institutional review board having in mind the recommended ethical measures of conducting research with human beings. The researcher conducted the study with focus on ethical practices in line with the procedures as outlined in the protocol.
The generalizability of the study therefore incorporates the following strategies into its procedures and analysis in order to ensure its reliability and validity. The data collection tool adopted reliable and valid questionnaires that had been previously used in other studies but were tweaked to fit the study under investigation. The quantitative data analysis used a suitable statistical procedure to check the level of significance if there were any changes. Furthermore, owing to the nature of the sample collected, the study has the following limitations of small sample size. However, purposeful samples reduce internal invalidity due to heterogeneous population by embracing only the homosexual subjects. The weaknesses of the study design and sources of bias are identified and these are reviewed in order to enhance the generalisation of information interpreted from the research work. The strict methods of data collection and data analysis methodology were used to enhance the credibility of the findings of the study.
This chapter described the methods used in the study to determine the effectiveness of positive psychology coaching on the level of teacher “career confidence”. It is for this reason that a quantitative method of assessment which involved the administration of a pre and post intervention survey of perceived self-efficacy and autonomy was used. To maintain ethical practice in the study, the participants were informed of their rights and their data were preserved and protected. Some steps were also taken to increase the credibility and accuracy of the data collected and yet they are aware that the study involved a limited number of participants. The described above methodology gives strong guidelines on how the research questions will be addressed effectively to determine the impact of the intervention on the teachers’ wellness and career progression in UAE private schools. Thus, the subsequent chapters of this work will be devoted to the findings and discussion of the study.
This chapter gives the results of this study, which aimed at assessing the effects of Positive Psychology Coaching on teacher self-efficacy and other related constructs in private schools in the UAE. This research design used pre-post intervention quantitative, and questionnaires were used to assess changes in the variables after a four-session coaching program. This chapter shall also describe the type of Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics used in the analysis of the data. However, there are limitations to the given study; firstly, the convenience sample size was limited to 51 participants. However, one advantage of this size is that it enables the researchers to cover specific areas extensively which is a disadvantage as the results may not be generalizable. It concludes the study and relates it to the research questions that have been developed at the beginning of the work.
To be more precise, before performing any analysis, the raw data from the survey had to go through a certain screening to check their accuracy and fitness for use. First, all the survey responses were coded from the text format to numerical as agreed on in chapter 3 of this study. This process facilitated quantitative analysis. After that, data entry errors, missing values and any forms of data inconsistencies were also checked on the dataset. While going through this stage, no mistakes were observed. There were no cases of missing values in the survey since all participants filled up all sections of the survey. This way, the inclusion of data is well checked so that the data collected are credible for statistical analysis.

(Source: SPSS)
Figure 1 presents the pre-intervention descriptive statistics for key variables. Mean scores for Classroom Challenge (CC), Teaching Autonomy (TA), Strengths Use (SU), Continue Teaching (CT), and Well-Being Improved (WB) were 3.39 (SD=1.168), 3.37 (SD=1.148), 3.61 (SD=1.201), 3.41 (SD=1.374), and 3.73 (SD=1.133), respectively. These scores indicate generally moderate levels across the five constructs. The standard deviations suggest a medium level of variance within the small sample size.

(Source: SPSS)
Before it was possible to determine the suitability of the parametric statistical tests, particularly the paired t-tests, it was necessary to check the normality of the data distribution. The assumption of normality is a requirement for the use of parametric tests as failure to meet this assumption will render the test invalid and unreliable. Thus, the normality test was carried out on the pre- and post-intervention scores of the five variables: Classroom Challenge (CC), Teaching Autonomy (TA), Strengths Use (SU), Continue Teaching (CT), and Well-Being Improved (WB). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used as the main test for normality. The Shapiro-Wilk test is optimal for sample sizes below 50, because it is more powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality.
The Shapiro-Wilk tests were analyzed to check if the variables met the normality assumption, and the findings are as follows. In particular, the pre-intervention mean scores of Classroom Challenge (CC), Teaching Autonomy (TA), Strengths Use (SU), Continue Teaching (CT), and Well-Being Improved (WB) were approximately normally distributed. The p-values for the Shapiro-Wilk tests on these variables were all less than .05, indicating that they were normally distributed. On the other hand, the post-intervention mean scores of Classroom Challenge (CC), Strengths Use (SU), and Well-Being Improved (WB) were not normally distributed, based on the p-values which were less than .05. This means that, contrary to expectations, the distribution of these scores was not normal after the intervention.
In contrast to Classroom Challenge, Strengths Use and Well-Being Improved, the results of Teaching Autonomy test for both pre and post intervention are normally distributed. Moreover, Continue Teaching tests indicates that both the pre and post intervention tests are normally distributed.
Since the normality assumption has been violated for Classroom Challenge, Strengths Use, and Well-Being Improved, non-parametric tests for comparing the pre- and post-intervention scores are used. Non-parametric tests do not assume any distribution of data and therefore are more suitable for non-normal data. For these variables, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used because it is a non-parametric test that is equivalent to the paired t-test. This test is appropriate as it is used to determine the significance of the difference between two related samples when the data is non-parametric. For the rest of the variables; Teaching Autonomy and Continue Teaching which are normally distributed, the paired t-test will be used. This way, the most appropriate statistical methods are used hence increasing the reliability of the results obtained.

(Source: SPSS)
Figure 3 illustrates the frequency distribution of Classroom Challenge (CC) scores pre-intervention. The distribution has a mean of 3.39 (SD = 1.168). The highest frequency of scores (20) falls at a value of 4, with decreasing frequencies seen at 1, 2, 3, and 5.

Figure 4 displays the pre-intervention distribution of TeachingAutonomy (TA) scores. The mean score is 3.37 (SD = 1.148). The most frequent scores are 3 and 4, with frequencies of 17 and 13, respectively. A lower frequency occurs at score 1, with a value of 3. This suggests that on average teachers may have had autonomy but some to not others suggest a medium level of variance.


Figure 4.5: Normality Test
(Source: SPSS)
Because of the low probability values in Shapiro-Wilk normality tests which suggest that all the variables did not meet the assumption of normality, the following combination of parametric and non-parametric tests was used to analyse the effects of PPC intervention. Namely, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be used to compare the results of Strengths Use and Continue Teaching since the normality is violated; these tests will be used to compare both, pre and post intervention. In all the tests conducted, the statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.
For each research question, the null hypothesis was formulated as there being no significant difference in the variable scores before and after the intervention. In this case, the Wilcoxon test statistics (W) will be stated and the significance value (p) will be stated. Besides the analysis, the value of Cohen’s d effect size will be calculated as well. In conclusion, the report will provide the interpretation of the results as far as the null hypothesis is concerned.

(Source: SPSS)
In order to examine the inter-relationship of the variables before the implementation of PPC, the correlation analysis was conducted on the data collected. The goal of this study is to establish the correlation between Classroom Challenge, Teaching Autonomy, Strengths Use, Continue Teaching, and Well-Being Improved at the baseline. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was employed to measure the strength and direction of these linear relationships. The descriptive statistics were used to test for the inter-correlation of the pre-intervention variables in the study and as shown in table 4.3 below;
Classroom Challenge (CC) had a significant positive relationship with Teaching Autonomy (TA) and it was equal to .515 and its sig was .000. This means that the higher the level of perceived self-efficacy for handling classroom issues, the higher the level of reported decision making and management of class business among teachers. This is in line with the expectation, whereby teachers who have confidence in handling the students are most probably to be given autonomy by the school authorities. In addition, the teachers may feel that challenges are manageable if they have autonomy in their working environment.
Also, Classroom Challenge (CC) had a positive correlation with Strengths Use (SU) with correlation coefficient of .283 and a significance level of .044. This signifies that teachers with high perceived competence in dealing with classroom issues are likely to apply their assets in professional issues including resilience and optimism. This is quite logical as when teachers have a low perception of their competence to address certain tasks, they may lose morale and, therefore, are unlikely to apply their strengths.
It is also important to note that, Classroom Challenge (CC) was not found to have a positive relationship with Continue Teaching (CT) or WellBeingImproved (WB).
There was a significant positive relationship between TA and CC, and moderate positive relationship between TA and SU (r = .282, p = .045) and TA and CT (r = .332, p = .017). This means that, the more an educator is allowed to make independent decisions, the better placed he or she is in handling challenges in a class. The connection between TA and SU may be due to the fact that some of the teachers would include this strength in teaching autonomy. Thus, there is a positive correlation between the level of autonomy experienced by teachers and the level of continuation in teaching as indicated by CT; this could be due to the fact that:
In the same manner as the Classroom Challenge, Teaching Autonomy was not found to be associated with WellBeingImproved (WB). It was found that SU had a positive relationship with CC and TA. Nevertheless, it did not show any positive association with Continue Teaching (CT) or WellBeingImproved (WB). WellBeingImproved (WB) had a positive correlation with Continue Teaching (CT) (r = .434, p = .001) This means that if the teachers have an intention of teaching, the same holds an intention of improving wellness. This is in line with the results formulated where the data depicts a positive relationship between wellness and future plan to work as teachers. As for the second research question, it is also important to mention the positive correlation between TA and CT, that is, the intent to continue working as teachers is linked to autonomy.
On the basis of the analysis of the five factors in the dataset, this paper also aimed at showing the relationship between the factors. From the standpoint of the research questions that concern this relationship that links the factors, it can be suggested that there is no direct or immediate relationship between positive psychology (that entails hope, optimism, self-belief and resilience) and the core/ intentions to continue working as teachers. Nevertheless, there is a relationship between Teaching Autonomy and intentions to work as teachers, and the autonomy of teachers and how the factor relates and links all the factors.



(Source: SPSS)
In order to establish the relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable, a multiple linear regression analysis was carried out. In this analysis, Classroom Challenge (CC) was therefore measured as the dependent variable while the independent variables were Teaching Autonomy (TA), Strengths Use (SU), Continue Teaching (CT), and Well-Being Improved (WB). The purpose of this study was to establish how much of these pre-intervention variables can predict teachers’ self-efficacy to handle classroom difficulties.
To determine how well the regression model performed, the statistical metrics or measures, R, R-square, and adjusted R-square were utilized. In this situation, the model achieved an R value of .523 which indicates that there was a somewhat positive correlation between the independent variables; Teaching Autonomy, Strengths Use, Continue Teaching, and Well-Being Improved and the dependent variable; Classroom Challenge. The analysis conducted showed that the R-squared value of the .274 indeed suggests that the model's independent variables have the capability to explain approximately 27.4 percent of the variance in teachers’ perceived ability to manage the challenges. Especially, the value of the adjusted R-squared of .211 is a more realistic estimation of the model’s predictive ability because it complements the number of independent variables with the sample size. This means that in a general population, the model is capable of accounting for 21.1 % of the variation in the results.
The variance analysis that was done also shed more light on the importance of the regression model. Additionally, the ANOVA test revealed that the F-statistic is significant at the .05 level (F = 4.336, df = 4,46), which suggests that, taken together, the independent variables have a strong effect on the dependent variable. In other words, the variability in teachers’ perceived ability to manage the classroom challenges can be explained by the Teaching Autonomy, Strengths Use, Continue Teaching, and Well-Being Improved. The calculated p-value of 0.005 shows that there is a strong relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable and that the results cannot be due to chance.
To establish the significance of each independent variable in the prediction of Classroom Challenge (CC), an analysis of the regression coefficients was made. The coefficients table gives the raw coefficients (B), the standardized coefficients (Beta), t-statistics, and the probabilities of the predictor variables. In this case, Teaching Autonomy (TA) was found to be a significant predictor of Classroom Challenge (CC) regression equation was statistically significant, F (7, 301) = 23.400, p < .001. This implies that the teachers who teach their lessons and control their classroom environment independently are likely to view themselves as better placed to handle the challenges that are likely to arise in the classroom. The positive unstandardized coefficient (.529) indicates that for each one unit change in Teaching Autonomy, there is a .529 unit change in the extent to which teachers feel capable of handling challenges in their classrooms, other things being equal. The standardized coefficient (Beta = .521) gives a standardized measure of the effect size which shows that Teaching Autonomy has a positive and strong effect on Classroom Challenge controlling the other variables in the equation. This is because the small P value leads to a high level of significance of the result. This leads to a direct research question to ask which is how are TA and CC inter related.
This regression analysis shows that it has a significant role in boosting classroom confidence. In the interventions or discussions, it is necessary to indicate the role of TA in addressing the challenges. Strengths Use (SU) was not a significant predictor of Classroom Challenge (CC) (B = .160, p = .209). This means that, controlling for the other variables in the model, teachers’ self-estimated use of strengths in dealing with professional difficulties cannot predict their estimate of the ability to handle classroom difficulties. That is, self-belief, optimism and such other strengths cannot be of any use in the challenges to the classroom. The finding is counter-intuitive because the program itself is based on the premise of not addressing the strengths in the teaching.
Similarly, Well-Being Improved (WB) and Continue Teaching (CT) did not show any significant relationship in determining Classroom Challenge (CC) (F = .890 and F = .310 respectively). This implies that overall job satisfaction and the probability of teachers’ continuation in teaching profession in the next five years has no relationship with perceived self-efficacy to handle classroom difficulties once other variables in the model have been controlled for. This goes against what has been said in the introduction and what is believed in general that well-being and confidence and the ability to cope with the challenges of the class are related. As the figure above shows, should there be such an increase in confidence, WB and CT have no role to play.
As for the research purpose, regression models have a role to answer the main research questions, the model itself shows a high level of reliability F=4,336 In addition, the significance level of these findings is p < 0,05 which means that the findings are highly reliable and useful. Therefore, from a research point of view, despite the problems with the limited size this model points to very reliable outcomes with a set of the factors. However, the moment the factors are broken down, one finds that they are not related and that there is no link between the factors. In particular with WB and CT.
However, if you look at the part that is played by the autonomy on the challenges, that could take you further and be part of the qualitative aspect during the intervention. The fact that the rest did not emerge means there can also be an investigation because self-belief and optimism for example did not lead to positive change. If the participants did not respond favorably, it may be because the interventions were not beneficial and that could be the topic of discussion.
This chapter presented an analysis of the quantitative data collected to investigate the impact of Positive Psychology Coaching (PPC) on teacher self-efficacy and related constructs. Several key findings emerged from the analysis, providing partial answers to the research questions posed at the outset of this study.
The descriptive statistics revealed moderate levels of Classroom Challenge, Teaching Autonomy, Strengths Use, Continue Teaching, and Well-Being Improved among the participant teachers at the pre-intervention stage. The Shapiro-Wilk normality tests indicated that the pre-intervention scores followed approximate normal distribution whereas the post-intervention scores for most of the variables violated the assumption of normality, necessitating the use of non-parametric tests in subsequent analyses. However, the violation of the assumption indicates how different the responses of the questions may have been, depending on the individual.
The correlation analysis revealed significant positive relationships between Teaching Autonomy and Classroom Challenge, as well as between Continue Teaching and Well-Being Improved. These findings suggest that teachers who experience greater autonomy in their teaching practices also tend to perceive a greater ability to manage classroom challenges effectively and that intention and wellness can be interconnected for the benefit of all teachers involved. More positive connections could be found for the data, connecting optimism, self-belief with teachers, or connections that help all teachers see a correlation between confidence.
The regression analysis, with Classroom Challenge as the dependent variable, demonstrated that Teaching Autonomy emerged as a statistically significant predictor, accounting for a significant portion of the variance in teachers' perceived ability to manage classroom challenges, or rather, that it accounts for some of the relationships. However, the models do not address the fact that there is no relationship between strengths, wellbeing and intent. The other factors may play an indirect function to help strengthen what is already believed by the teachers. It has to be noted that TA might already be an existing trait by many teachers due to their circumstances and not due to any particular external factor. This would need further and in depth questioning of participants and reasons for that relationship.
In summary, while the quantitative data
provide some insights into the relationships between the variables under
investigation, the limited sample size (n=51) constrains the ability to draw
definitive conclusions and limits the generalizability of the findings. The low
sample also constrains what the statistics can offer, however it can also be a
foundation to further explore the results through the qualitative data, to see
if it is possible to ask or explore why they exist.
The results may provide partial answers to the research questions posed at the
beginning of the study. There is a potential connection between a group of
traits and outcomes relating to the traits. It has not fully answered many or
any questions, rather this would be a starting point and basis to investigate
the data, to see which methods would strengthen the connections to the
findings.
This chapter presents the outcomes of the exploration on the effect of positive psychology coaching on the “career confidence” of teachers in private schools in the UAE. The study adopted a primary quantitative design which included both quantitative measures in the form of pre- and post-intervention surveys and qualitative measures from the coaching sessions. The findings suggest self-efficacy, autonomy, and self-awareness among teachers were positively enhanced through the intervention. Still, the limitations of the research, most notably the inadequate number of subjects, impose a guarded interpretation of the results and propose areas for additional inquiry. The analysis will focus on these outcomes’ relevance to the “professional development” of teachers and the administration of schools in the UAE.
Interpretation of Findings
The results from the study provide a nuanced appreciation of the effects of positive psychology coaching on teacher career self-confidence with regard to private schools in the UAE. The quantitative data indicated a significant increase in perceived teaching autonomy after the intervention, which implies that the coaching program helped teachers to feel more in control of their professional life and classroom environments (Alrabai, 2021). This is consistent with the theoretical framework which places great importance on autonomy as a component that drives self-efficacy and well-being. Even though the anticipated positive relationship between self-efficacy and the ability to deal with classroom challenges was not empirically supported through regression analysis, the strong positive association between teaching autonomy and perceived ability to deal with classroom challenges suggests that positive autonomy may be a powerful way in which positive psychology interventions enhance teacher confidence.
This finding demonstrates the need for developing favourable conditions that recognize teachers’ self-determination and the freedom to make decisions. The unexpected finding of not having a significant relationship between personal strengths and perceived ability to deal with challenges in class instruction deserves attention. Perhaps the broad focus of the intervention on well-being and autonomy facilitated strength use without being captured by the quantitative measures. This means that the impact, while aimed at strengths, may have been felt in more indirect ways without clear measurement. It might be beneficial to consider other approaches measuring the impact of self-belief and strengths in future work.
The qualitative information collected, even though it has not been analysed in this report, is essential to understanding the numerical data patterns. More detailed analysis indicates that the participants had greater self-awareness, enabling them to recognize and deal with their professional problems and issues. Some notes from the sessions suggest the presence of new thought patterns, accompanied by a feeling of hope and active positive coping strategies. This is consistent with the basic concepts of positive psychology coaching and suggests the use of these methods for personal change and better control of emotions among teachers. So, the participants' narratives have shown a remarkable transformation from feeling and acting in a negatively un-self-aware way to a positively self-aware and optimistic manner.
It is interesting to note the positive relationship between the intention of staying in the teaching profession and the increase in well-being. This implies that teacher wellbeing is a significant factor in their retention. As it is attempted in the positive psychology coaching program, it may be essential for the UAE education sector’s well-known problem of teacher attrition to be solved by implementing measures which directly target teacher wellbeing (Singh and Gautam, 2024). However, it is equally important to note that there seems to be no relationship between the increase in self-reported wellbeing and the perceived self-efficacy in dealing with the challenges of the classroom. This may be an example of the many ways teachers’ wellbeing is complex; those who lack self-assurance in dealing with classroom challenges are not the sole ones affected. For more detailed examination of the relationship between wellbeing and self-efficacy, this is where further research will look into the more advanced methods.
While reflecting upon the predictive impact teaching autonomy possesses in managing classroom challenges, the regression analysis has also pointed towards the absence of predictive influence other factors such as use of strengths and reported improvements of well-being had. This outcome is somewhat unexpected especially in light of the theoretical framework of the study. Notably, these findings do not disprove the effectiveness of the intervention, but instead highlight the attention which must be paid to the measures of what has been done and to the interplay between “teacher well-being”, confidence, and performance. Perhaps, the existing degree of autonomy in the teachers' situation was so highly associated with their confidence that any further contribution by the intervention was insignificant.
It is essential to recognize the limitations of the study, especially the relatively small sample size. It is likely that some bias was introduced by the convenience sampling method, and the lack of a control group makes it difficult to substantiate claims that the positive changes are due only to the positive psychology coaching. Therefore, while it is plausible that such interventions could be beneficial, further investigation is needed with wider samples, more diverse populations, and a stronger research framework to validate these impacts and purposely try to make the findings more applicable. More advanced assessments of self-efficacy, autonomy, and well-being, along with positive psychology coaching, could also capture the longer-term effects and could also be the subject of future research.
Implications for Practice
Any noteworthy concepts from this study are most likely relevant to the creation of teacher “professional development” activities in the UAE private school sector with high teacher attrition. One point relates to the finding of a positive and meaningful correlation between higher degrees of teaching autonomy and self-assessed capabilities in managing some of the challenges of the classroom (r = .515, p < .001). It demonstrates the need to build more empowering and positive work environments. Such a relationship is indicative that teachers are more effective in dealing with and coping with various classroom challenges when they have more autonomy in their teaching functions. “professional development” programs need to shift from the traditional narrow pedagogy with teaching skills focus to the broad pedagogy of teaching with emphasis on the teacher’s power and control over professional life focus (Hennessy et al. 2022). This means giving the teachers more authority not just over lesson plans but also over the management of the class and evaluation of students. It is also critical that teachers be able to assume responsibility for the development of their professional programs.
School administrators significantly contribute to creating an environment that promotes autonomy and support (Guay, 2022). The results indicate that school administrators need to focus on establishing suitable communication structures where teachers are able to communicate their issues and work together to solve them. Adopting a more effective motivational strategy by celebrating and appreciating teachers’ diverse talents and contributions, leadership could increase their work motivation and satisfaction. Moreover, leaders should proactively eliminate excessive administrative tasks and improve the balance of work among teachers as a means of reducing the overload that leads to teacher burnout (Abdulaziz et al. 2022). Feeling supported and belonging can be fostered through regular check-ins and mentoring sessions.
The stronger the correlation between well-being and intention to continue teaching, the greater the justification there is for attempting to improve well-being in teachers’ “professional development” (r = .434, p = .001). Such programs should incorporate stress relievers, self-reflective mindfulness activities, and socialization-enhancing colleagues’ interactions. The development of constructive professional learning communities (PLCs) can enhance peer encouragement and engagement, as well as help in collective reading (Antinluoma et al. 2021). Such communities can function as refuges where educators can candidly express frustrations, exchange useful information, and receive assistance from colleagues. Additionally, schools could further enhance teachers’ mental and emotional health by providing access to counseling services or wellness programs.
The regression analysis did not have sufficient predictive power from all variables, however, Teaching Autonomy did prove to be a statistically significant predictor of Classroom Challenge (β = .521, p < .05). This underscores the need to promote autonomy to enhance the teacher's self-efficacy in dealing with classroom challenges. Although other factors like Strengths Use and Well-being were non-factors of the Classroom Challenge regression model, with the strongest correlations with teaching autonomy and classroom challenge, the data supports the idea that teaching autonomy should be improved to enhance teacher self-efficacy. The adjusted R-squared of .211 suggests that model is significant, but not all that impressive, moreover, this value suggests an incomplete understanding of the variance in the Classroom. This shows that teacher efficacy is multi-dimensional and therefore requires more balance in its enhancements for teacher “professional development”.
The acknowledged limitations of this study, especially the absence of a control group and a small sample size, should be attended to when integrating these implications. Further, the emerging patterns of autonomy and well-being from both quantitative and qualitative data reinforces the need to address these concerning issues related to job satisfaction retention among teachers. Further studies are needed to verify and elaborate the results, yet their application in practice is evident: support and well-being along with culture of autonomy are vital in nurturing a sustainable and thriving teaching workforce. Such schools become more attractive to highly qualified teachers, thus serving the interest of both the students and teachers.
Despite being suggestive, these findings need to be interpreted with caution due to certain limitations. First, the sample size is small, which reduces the scope of the results, and second, the sample was taken from a predefined population which could have created bias. Third, without a control group, it is difficult to assess how much of the positive outcomes can be attributed to the positive psychology coaching intervention. In addition, self-reporting introduces a significant risk of biases in responses. Finally, with the qualitative data analysis being so shallow, those interpretations will always be restricted. These limitations emphasize the need for additional research to challenge and support these conclusions using stronger techniques.
This chapter looked into the effects of positive psychology coaching on private school teachers' “career confidence” in the UAE. There seems to be an increase in classroom management confidence as teaching autonomy increases, as well as a positive relationship between well-being and willingness to continue teaching. Nonetheless, these factors are more complex, and in combination with the provided limitations of sample size and research design, further attempts to explore the relationship between “teacher well-being”, career satisfaction, and the numerous factors interlinked with it are necessary.
This research studied how positive psychology coaching affects teacher “career confidence” in private schools in the UAE for the very first time. With regards to the intervention’s impact on self-efficacy, autonomy, self-awareness, well-being, and overall teaching, a primary quantitative approach was employed. The positive gains teachers reported experiencing from the coaching were valuable despite the small sample size and absent control group. After the intervention, the positive change that was noticed which stood out was the increase in the perception of autonomy over the teaching. This indicated that the coaching program improved teachers’ perceptions of control over their lives and professional domains. This enhanced autonomy was associated with the teachers having greater confidence in controlling the challenges posed in the classroom. The regression analysis was not able to conclusively ascertain the actual impact on self-efficacy. Nonetheless, the strong positive correlation between autonomy and confidence for controlling different factors in the classroom suggests that autonomy is an important contributor to the wellbeing and effectiveness of the teachers.
The qualitative data that was not fully captured in this study was highly contextual, suggesting that participants developed a deeper level of self-awareness and adopted more proactive coping mechanisms. This correlation that was noted regarding the positive change in well-being and the intention of the participant to continue teaching is one important consideration of the interrelation of “teacher well-being” and retention. This indicates an urgent need to address the issue of teacher “professional development” from a comprehensive perspective that goes beyond pedagogical training to include teacher and emotional care. The limitations of the current study, particularly the narrow sample size and lack of control group, are important to note. Still, the emerging narrative concerning autonomy and well-being as important determinants in the quantitative and qualitative data is strong enough to make a case for further research in these areas. These results provide further evidence in the discourse on “teacher well-being” and the “professional development” and retention issues in focus in the education system of UAE.
The conclusions drawn from this study outline some issues regarding teachers’ “professional development” and retention in the private schools in the UAE. Given the strong relationship between teaching autonomy and teacher self-efficacy, it is suggested that future “professional development” activities should try to offer teachers initiatives which grant them more control over their lives. This might allow teachers to control the processes of curriculum design, classroom management, and evaluation. Along with that, school administrators should build a culture of trust and collegiality which involves communication and participative decision-making (Sahlin, 2023). Moreover, it is also essential that practitioners attempt to form supportive PLCs in which teachers can get professional help from other teachers of the same PLC. These PLCs would be helpful in dealing with apparent systemic issues and in developing collective identity and collective efficacy.
In order to tackle the issue of teacher wellbeing, which intersects with retention, “professional development” courses need to add stress relief practices, mindfulness, and work-life balance activities. Schools’ ought to allocate funds towards counsellors and wellness programs to better aid the emotional and mental health of teachers (Heinrich et al., 2023). Alongside this, leadership and teacher evaluation should adopt a more strengths-based perspective of identifying and appreciating the outstanding contributions made by teachers. This can greatly enhance morale and job satisfaction. Owing in the gaps of the study, more inclusive and representative samples with a control group should be added to make more valid conclusions with the coaching positive psychology. There should be more longitudinal studies focused on the long-term impacts of the interventions on teacher wellbeing, career fulfilment, and ultimately, the academic achievement of students. There is also a need to understand the positive and negative impacts of multiple dimensions of teacher wellbeing and confidence. An analysis of the rich qualitative data collected would further explore the observed effects of these coaching sessions.
This study's limitations, namely the insufficient sample size and absence of a control group, suggest some prospects for forthcoming studies. More inclusive research is required to aid in the generalization of the results. The longitudinal studies could monitor the impact of positive psychology coaching on the well-being and retention of teachers over an extended period. Other studies need to determine the impacts of various coaching styles, as well as the best ways to provide such absence interventions in private schools in the UAE. Focusing on the role of school culture and leadership styles as mediators to the impact of coaching would contribute to the understanding of this phenomenon. Some clarifications of these intervention’s impacts on the educational system could be provided by studying the teachers’ well-being in relation to their students' outcomes.
Abdallah, A.K. and Alriyami, R., 2022. Changes in the education landscape caused by COVID-19: Opportunities and challenges from UAE perspective. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(3), pp.544-559.
Abdulaziz, A., Bashir, M. and Alfalih, A.A., 2022. The impact of work-life balance and work overload on teacher’s organizational commitment: do Job Engagement and Perceived Organizational support matter. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), pp.9641-9663.
Aboalshamat, K., Al-Zaidi, D., Jawa, D., Al-Harbi, H., Alharbi, R. and Al-Otaibi, S., 2020. The effect of life coaching on psychological distress among dental students: interventional study. BMC psychology, 8, pp.1-8.
Alrabai, F., 2021. The influence of autonomy-supportive teaching on EFL students’ classroom autonomy: An experimental intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p.728657.
Al‐Rashaida, M. and Massouti, A., 2024. Assessing the efficacy of online teacher training programs in preparing pre‐service teachers to support students with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms in the UAE: A case study. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24(1), pp.188-200.
Al-Waqfi, M.A., Tlaiss, H. and Ghoudi, K., 2023. Career adaptability as a predictor of job search intentions and career readiness of young adults in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Career Development, 50(5), pp.1076-1096.
Antinluoma, M., Ilomäki, L. and Toom, A., 2021, April. Practices of professional learning communities. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 6, p. 617613). Frontiers Media SA.
Budden, T.J., Jackson, B. and Dimmock, J.A., 2020. Self-efficacy. In The Routledge international encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology (pp. 584-594). Routledge.
Burke, J., Dunne, P.J., Meehan, T., O’Boyle, C.A. and van Nieuwerburgh, C., 2022. Positive health: 100+ research-based positive psychology and lifestyle medicine tools to enhance your wellbeing. Routledge.
Epi.org, 2025. Understanding the Effectiveness of Teacher Attributes. Available at: https://www.epi.org/publication/books_teacher_quality_execsum_intro/ [Accessed on: 08.03.2025]
Fairman, J.C., Smith, D.J., Pullen, P.C. and Lebel, S.J., 2022. The challenge of keeping teacher professional development relevant. In Leadership for professional learning (pp. 251-263). Routledge.
Farahmand, S., Rad, E.M. and Keshmiri, F., 2022. Exploring the effective elements on the personal and professional development among health-care providers: a qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(1), p.256.
Fryer, L.K. and Leenknecht, M.J., 2023. Toward an organising theoretical model for teacher clarity, feedback and self-efficacy in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), p.68.
Gearhart, C.A., Blaydes, M. and McCarthy, C.J., 2022. Barriers to and facilitators for teachers’ wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p.867433.
Grass, J. and Strobel, A., 2024. Cognitive engagement and subjective well-being in adults: Exploring the role of domain-specific need for cognition. Journal of Intelligence, 12(11), p.110.
Guay, F., 2022. Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), pp.75-92.
Hamzah, S.R.A., Kai Le, K. and Musa, S.N.S., 2021. The mediating role of career decision self-efficacy on the relationship of career emotional intelligence and self-esteem with career adaptability among university students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 26(1), pp.83-93.
Heinrich, C.J., Colomer, A. and Hieronimus, M., 2023. Minding the gap: Evidence, implementation and funding gaps in mental health services delivery for school-aged children. Children and youth services review, 150, p.107023.
Hennessy, S., D'Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., Brugha, M. and Zubairi, A., 2022. Technology use for teacher “professional development” in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, p.100080.
Ji-hoon, K., 2024. Stress and Coping Mechanisms in South Korean High School Students: Academic Pressure, Social Expectations, and Mental Health Support. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 3(5), pp.45-54.
Joho, C., Mok, S.Y., Hoffelner, C. and Düggeli, A., 2024, December. Analyzing teachers’ competencies in career guidance: a systematic review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1488662). Frontiers Media SA.
Knowledge and Human Development Authority (KHDA) 2022, Wellbeing Matters: A guiding framework for the monitoring and improvement of wellbeing in Dubai private schools, KHDA, Dubai, viewed 14 February 2025, https://web.khda.gov.ae/en/Resources/Publications/School-Inspection/Wellbeing-Matters-A-guiding-framework-for-the-moni
Kovich, M.K., Simpson, V.L., Foli, K.J., Hass, Z. and Phillips, R.G., 2023. Application of the PERMA model of well-being in undergraduate students. International journal of community well-being, 6(1), pp.1-20.
Kramer, A., Dringenberg, E., Morris, C. and McCarthy, D., 2023. An Intervention to Promote Growth Mindset and STEM Self-Efficacy of High School Students: Exploring the Complexity of Beliefs. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 13(1), p.1.
Lambert, L., Warren, M.A., Schwam, A. and Warren, M.T., 2021. Positive psychology interventions in the United Arab Emirates: boosting wellbeing–and changing culture?. Current psychology, pp.1-14.
Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M.Ş. and Gümüş, S., 2021. The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), pp.430-453.
Menno, A.W.M., Simanjuntak, Y.I.W. and Linda, D., 2024. Overcoming Self-Efficacy Challenges in Teachers and Prospective Teachers: Key Factors and Solutions. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(2), pp.285-297.
Mohammad, A. and Borkoski, C., 2024. Organizational conditions and teacher turnover in private schools of United Arab Emirates. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, p.100801.
Mok, S.Y., Rupp, D. and Holzberger, D., 2023. What kind of individual support activities in interventions foster pre-service and beginning teachers’ self-efficacy? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 40, p.100552.
Munro, C., Barr, M. and van Nieuwerburgh, C., 2020. Creating coaching cultures in schools. In Sustaining Depth and Meaning in School Leadership (pp. 226-245). Routledge.
Olayemi, M.S., Olajide, O.O. and Ajayi, O.F., 2022. Application of Statistical Software in Quantitative Data Analysis. ABUAD International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2(1), pp.29-34.
Passmore, J. and Lai, Y.L., 2020. Coaching psychology: Exploring definitions and research contribution to practice. Coaching researched: A coaching psychology reader, pp.3-22.
Richter, S., Van Zyl, L.E., Roll, L.C. and Stander, M.W., 2021. Positive psychological coaching tools and techniques: A systematic review and classification. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, p.667200.
Sahlin, S., 2023. Teachers making sense of principals’ leadership in collaboration within and beyond school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(5), pp.754-774.
Salam, S.S., Ramadurg, U., Charantimath, U., Katageri, G., Gillespie, B., Mhetri, J., Patil, S., Mallapur, A., Karadiguddi, C., Vastrad, P. and Dandappanavar, A., 2023. Impact of a school‐based nutrition educational intervention on knowledge related to iron deficiency anaemia in rural Karnataka, India: A mixed methods pre–post interventional study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 130, pp.113-123.
Santiago, I.S.D., Dos Santos, E.P., da Silva, J.A., de Sousa Cavalcante, Y., Gonçalves Júnior, J., de Souza Costa, A.R. and Cândido, E.L., 2023. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of teachers and its possible risk factors: A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(3), p.1747.
Singh, Y.K. and Gautam, D.N.S., 2024. The impact of job satisfaction on teacher mental health: A call to action for educational policymakers. Open Education Studies, 6(1), p.20240008.
Smith, W.A., Boniwell, I. and Green, S. eds., 2021. Positive psychology Coaching in the workplace. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Stevenson, J., 2024. A review of positive psychological factors in the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and outcomes for university students. Child Protection and Practice, p.100009.
Viterouli, M., Belias, D., Koustelios, A. and Tsigilis, N., 2022, November. Refining employees’ engagement by incorporating self-directedness in training and work environments. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance.
Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., Subban, P. and Hitches, E., 2022. Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers’ engagement with inclusive practices. Teaching and teacher education, 117, p.103802.
Wuest, D.A. and Subramaniam, P.R., 2021. Building teacher resilience during a pandemic and beyond. Strategies, 34(5), pp.8-12.














